Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing,Related topics
WebAnimal testing is a worldwide controversy that is constantly battling between the benefits and drawbacks of using animals for scientific and commercial testing. They have been WebArguments against animal testing Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often WebIn “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in WebApr 23, · Animal testing affects over million animals a year. The main animals that are used are birds, fish, monkeys, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, cats, dogs, frogs, Web33 essay samples found Essay examples Essay topics Animal Testing should be Banned Words: Pages: 4 Written by PapersOwl author Many organizations are ... read more
Which would lead to inaccurate results, and nobody could be sure how it would genuinely affect humans till it is tested on humans. Another result of animal testing is medical advancement. Specifically, vaccines and medical procedures like open-heart surgery. Some vaccines that were tested on animals and have worked in the human trials are hepatitis B and polio. Also, by testing on animals, veterinary medicine has benefited. Doing experiments on animals gives researchers a promising idea of how that experiment is going to affect the human body Jiaa. Except, animal testing is inaccurate and, it is hard to see what will happen until testing is done on humans.
Although animal testing is harmful and inhumane to animals there are some positives. However, there are more negatives to animal testing than there are positives. In conclusion, animal testing needs to come to an end. First, animal testing is inhumane. It is cruel because the animals are constantly getting mistreated. Second, many of the test results are inaccurate and fail in human trials. Third, there are other alternatives to animal testing like human volunteers and vitro testing. Lastly, there are some positives to animal testing like product safety and medical improvement. Except there are more negatives to animal testing than positives and it must be stopped. Animal testing needs to be put to an end.
Curtis, Gary L. Gale Academic OneFile Select, link. Accessed 2 Nov. Jiaa, Sherry. Skip to content. Skip to navigation. Site Navigation What we do Make a change Shop Donate. Utility Nav Site Search Search our site. Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Richard Klausner, former director of the US National Cancer Institute. Our research has shown that using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides statistically little useful insight.
Our study also revealed that drug tests on monkeys are just as poor as those using any other species in predicting the effects on humans. Dangerous animal testing Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys and five other animal species but has been estimated to have caused around , heart attacks and strokes and 60, deaths worldwide. Human volunteers testing a new monoclonal antibody treatment TGN at Northwick Park Hospital, UK, in suffered a severe immune reaction and nearly died. Testing on monkeys at times the dose given to the volunteers totally failed to predict the dangerous side effects.
A drug trial in France resulted in the death of one volunteer and left four others severely brain damaged in A clinical trial of Hepatitis B drug fialuridine had to be stopped because it caused severe liver damage in seven patients, five of whom died. It had been tested on animals first. The most commonly used species of monkey to test drug safety Cynomolgous macaque monkeys is resistant to doses of paracetamol acetaminophen that would be deadly in humans. It is simply cruel to raise an animal only to kill it later all in the name of testing a cosmetic, a drug, or a new food product.
About 30 million animals, every year, are used in research projects and experiments. A majority of these animals die immediately after the test, some are killed, and some die later due to post experiment effects. One of the arguments raised by the supporters of animal experimentation is that the results of these processes are very vital for the survival of the human race. Further, they claim that human beings cannot be used by medical practitioners for various experiments, whose results are not safely predetermined. The supporters therefore take into account this factor and consequently justify the use of animals as the next best option for crucial medical experimentation.
Further, members of this school of thought point out that most of the technological advancement in the medical realm is resultant due to the numerous tests carried out on animals. They also argue that medical practitioners prefer this mode of experimentation and should not be questioned as they are professionals and should therefore have the final say. Those supporting animal testing defend their position with the argument that society has benefited from this research. They argue that since animal testing has played a significant role in ensuring how safe new drugs and medical procedures are, then the testing is necessary.
According to them, there is moral justification to use animals in experiments that are dangerous and at times painful as the findings are used for the greater good of the society. Animal rights activists claim that procedures such as use of tissue sample, computer modeling, and cell cultures are alternatives to animal testing. However those supporting animal testing argue that these alternatives are not useful as they lack accuracy. The latter argument may be true but it is important to note that we as human beings have an ethical responsibility to animals; this responsibility means protecting them and not subjecting them to painful experiments simply because they cannot sue or speak out their opinion. It is also important to point that the bodily functions of animals such as rats is different from that of human beings and hence animal testing is not really a necessity.
The issue of how ethical animal experimentation is? Has not been clearly defined; but using general standards, a medical procedure is not ethical if it subjects the patient to undue pain and suffering. Those who argue that animals should be used in experiments do so mainly based on the assumption that animals do not feel any pain. However since research has shown that animals are susceptible to pain though the question on whether they are able to remember the pain has still not yet being answered. Hence if animals can feel pain then animal experimentation that subjects the animals to pain cannot be supported. Singer also points out that some institutions conducting animal experimentation do not use analgesics. This further shows that animal experimentation in most cases does not adhere to ethics.
The beliefs held by the supporters of animal experimentation are full of flaws evidently. It is not true that medical advancement and technology owes its current state to the processes of animal experimentation. Causes and cures of many maladies have resulted in alternatives ways other than animal experimentation Brecher 4. For instance the cause and cure of scurvy were found out through human experimentation. Why was penicillin discovered without animal experimentation? These are some of the questions that the supporters of animal experimentation need to ask. It is evident that there exist numerous alternatives to animal experimentations. The argument that the medical practitioners have the final wise say is not rightly applicable.
A human face integrated with the profession of medicine is non-supportive of animal experimentation. Animals are susceptible to pain; why then should medical practitioners engage in the unethical process of inflicting deliberate pain on animals? Animals cannot consent or dissent the procedure. However, it is obvious that the animals would not prefer such acts towards them. Animals are living beings, and the only difference with us that makes them not give their opinion on this issue is that they cannot talk. But from if the findings from experiments they are involved in are considered valid then findings that these animals also experience pain should not be ignored. It is hence important that animal experimentation puts into consideration that though the animals may not speak out their pain, they do feel pain and hence experiments should be conducted with the highest ethics.
Scruton, Roger. Singer, Peter.
So far, nearly million animals have been used for experiments annually. Many people have been arguing whether animal testing be banned? Obviously, the answer is animal testing should not be banned. Due to animal can be tested to ensure the safety of some cosmetics, animal testing has contributed to many life-saving and treatment and animal testing has also benefited on animal themselves, so animal testing has become an indispensable part of human development. To begin with, animal can be tested in order to ensure the safety of some cosmetics. Personal care products will be used an average of 12 in American woman, and animal testing can better protect humans from cosmetic damage before they use cosmetics.
According to American Food and Drug in the article , animal testing definitely should be used in cosmetics because animal testing can ensure the safety of products or ingredients. Human use these untested cosmetics and base on the average daily use of cosmetics in the United States, the security of ourselves will be riskier. Therefore, the safety of cosmetics cannot without animal testing. Furthermore, animal testing has contributed to save our lives. Every life is very precious, and no one wants to leave this beautiful world because of illness. Animal testing is an important way of solving disease problems. Simon in the article says some medicine has already applied, such as antibiotics, anesthetic, organ transplants, and diabetes insulin are all breakthroughs in animal testing.
These results have successfully saved millions of humans around the world. Animal testing has become an indispensable part of saving lives. Therefore, this is why animal testing has contributed a lot to save our lives. Order custom essay Against animal testing essay with free plagiarism report. In addition, animal testing has also benefited on animal themselves. Dogs are one of our most loyal partners and no one wants them to suffer illness. These contributions are good for the animals to solve the disease. For example, rabies, infectious hepatitis and tetanus of animals can be solved by drugs with animal testing. So, animal testing also helps animal to benefit themselves. This essay was written by a fellow student. You can use it as an example when writing your own essay or use it as a source, but you need cite it.
Did you know that we have over 70, essays on 3, topics in our database? Explore how the human body functions as one unit in harmony in order to life. Against animal testing essay. Free Essays - PhDessay. com, Aug 04, Accessed February 3, com , Aug The situation and environment of animal testing is extremely well in modern. It is a positive and efficient way to help people researching and trying in different kinds of professional. Animal testing is the act of using non-uman animals in research, development projects or scientific experiments. Hundreds of millions of animals are being used annually for scientific research, but because.
ECPI University Every year millions of animals are subjected to horrible unethical experimentations in order to advance medical science. Dogs, cats, monkeys, mice, and other animals are kept in dark. Many years ago, people follow particular traditions that involves animal sacrifice. According to biblical history, animals were often killed to use as sacrifices to God. In Genesis, Abraham sacrificed a. Is Animal Testing Wrong? Would you want to put your best four legged friend through torture to find out if something, such as lipstick, would okay for humans? I know,. When shopping at a store, no one ever thinks when he or she buys makeup, cleaning products, deodorant or lotion, that it has potentially hurt an innocent animal.
In fact,. Animal Testing People argue that animal testing kills to many animals. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Home Page Biology Animals Animal Testing Against animal testing essay. Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade. check my essay hire writer. Order original essay sample specially for your assignment needs. get custom essay. People Should Continue to Use Animal Testing. Essay type Research. The Issue of Animal Testing: Pros and Cons. Should Animal Testing Remain Legal? Why Animal Testing Can Save Our Lives. Animal Testing Is Morally Wrong. Animal Testing. Animal Testing Controversy. Animal Testing: Helps Both Humans and Other Animals. Similar Topics Genetically Modified Foods Endangered Animals Animal Ethics Cruelty to Animals Maus Animal Welfare Pets Cloning Healthy Lifestyle Health And Fitness Birds Dog Sharks Mental Health Dolphin Dragon Plants Animals Personality Disorder Fox.
Save time and let our verified experts help you. Hire writer.
Against animal testing essay,Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses
WebNov 13, · It is simply cruel to raise an animal only to kill it later all in the name of testing a cosmetic, a drug, or a new food product. About 30 million animals, every year, WebAnimal testing is a worldwide controversy that is constantly battling between the benefits and drawbacks of using animals for scientific and commercial testing. They have been WebArguments against animal testing Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often WebSep 3, · Most Interesting Animal Testing Topics to Write about An Argument Against Animal Testing of Consumer Products and Drugs The Consequences and Unethical WebApr 23, · Animal testing affects over million animals a year. The main animals that are used are birds, fish, monkeys, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, cats, dogs, frogs, WebIn “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in ... read more
The use of animals in research is essential to the development of new and more effective methods for diagnosing and treating diseases Home Page Biology Animals Animal Testing Against animal testing essay. Though these alternatives may not replace all animal testing; but, it would […]. Many people this day and age are turning to veganism and holding concerns about the mistreatment of animals, so the issue is likely to remain a hot topic for some time. Animal testing is a worldwide controversy that is constantly battling between the benefits and drawbacks of using animals for scientific and commercial testing. Essay examples.
Words: subtitle: Essays against animal testing experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous. What is animal testing? Cite this page Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Vancouver Chicago ASA IEEE AMA. Except there are more negatives to animal testing than positives and it must be stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment